LIU
W-L: (12- 6) PR = 81.3276Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 207 A Hofstra Colonial ( 9- 7, 86.5) 6-11 215 A Massachusetts-Lowell America East (11- 6, 85.4) 6-15 219 H Bryant America East (11- 7, 85.8) 7-11 222 A Massachusetts Atlantic 10 (15- 3, 91.0) 5-19 226 H Manhattan Metro Atlanti ( 3-13, 80.0) 10- 9 301 H Iona Metro Atlanti ( 9- 9, 82.5) 7- 5 309 H Vermont America East ( 6- 9, 83.7) 6-11 315 A Fairleigh Dickinson Northeast ( 5-11, 76.5) 10- 7 322 H Delaware State Northeast ( 0-14, 69.3) 19- 1 326 A Wagner Northeast ( 8- 7, 79.3) 11-12 329 A Le Moyne Northeast ( 4-13, 76.9) 9- 5 405 A Mercyhurst Northeast ( 6- 9, 76.5) 19- 9 409 H Central Connecticut Northeast ( 2-13, 73.5) 16- 2 412 H Stonehill Northeast (11- 7, 79.8) 11- 9 419 H St Francis Northeast ( 7-10, 78.2) 11-10 426 A Howard (DC) Northeast ( 1-14, 70.5) 13- 4 501 N Wagner Northeast ( 8- 7, 79.3) 13- 7 503 A Stonehill Northeast (11- 7, 79.8) 14- 9
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
207 A Hofstra 6-11 -5 -6 0.00
215 A Massachusetts-Lowell 6-15 -9 -5 -0.49
219 H Bryant 7-11 -4 -4 0.04
222 A Massachusetts 5-19 -14 -10 0.00
226 H Manhattan 10- 9 1 2 -0.79
301 H Iona 7- 5 2 -1 + 2.69
309 H Vermont 6-11 -5 -2 - -3.05
315 A Fairleigh Dickinson 10- 7 3 4 -1.39
322 H Delaware State 19- 1 18 12 0.00
326 A Wagner 11-12 -1 2 - -2.61
329 A Le Moyne 9- 5 4 4 0.03
405 A Mercyhurst 19- 9 10 4 0.61
409 H Central Connecticut 16- 2 14 8 0.00
412 H Stonehill 11- 9 2 2 0.01
419 H St Francis 11-10 1 4 - -2.58
426 A Howard (DC) 13- 4 9 10 0.00
501 N Wagner 13- 7 6 2 + 2.93
503 A Stonehill 14- 9 5 1 + 3.94
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 309 H Vermont 6-11 -5 -2 - -3.05 326 A Wagner 11-12 -1 2 - -2.61 419 H St Francis 11-10 1 4 - -2.58 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 301 H Iona 7- 5 2 -1 + 2.69 501 N Wagner 13- 7 6 2 + 2.93 503 A Stonehill 14- 9 5 1 + 3.94 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akron | Akron | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Akron | |
| Albany | Albany | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | Albany | |
| American | American | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | American | |
| Arizona State | Arizona State | Arizona State | ||
| Army | Army | Army | ||
| Binghamton | Binghamton | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | Binghamton | |
| Boston College | Boston College | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Boston College | |
| Boston University | Boston University | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Boston University | |
| Brown | Brown | Brown 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Bryant | Bryant | Bryant | ||
| Bucknell | Bucknell | Bucknell | ||
| Butler | LIU | LIU | ||
| California | California | California | ||
| Campbell | Campbell | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Campbell | |
| Canisius | LIU | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | LIU | |
| Central Connecticut | LIU | LIU | ||
| Central Michigan | LIU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | LIU | |
| Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Cincinnati | ||
| Clemson | Clemson | Clemson | ||
| Coastal Carolina | Coastal Carolina | Coastal Carolina | ||
| Colgate | Colgate | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Colgate | |
| Colorado | Colorado | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Colorado | |
| Columbia | Columbia | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 0) | Columbia | |
| Connecticut | Connecticut | Connecticut 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Cornell | Cornell | Cornell | ||
| Dartmouth | Dartmouth | Dartmouth 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Davidson | Davidson | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Davidson | |
| Delaware | Delaware | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 0) | Delaware | |
| Delaware State | LIU | LIU | ||
| Denver | Denver | Denver | ||
| Detroit Mercy | LIU | LIU | ||
| Drexel | Drexel | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 0) | Drexel | |
| Duke | Duke | Duke | ||
| Duquesne | LIU | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | LIU | |
| East Carolina | East Carolina | East Carolina | ||
| Eastern Michigan | Eastern Michigan | Eastern Michigan | ||
| Elon | Elon | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Elon | |
| Fairfield | Fairfield | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Fairfield | |
| Fairleigh Dickinson | LIU | LIU | ||
| Florida | Florida | Florida | ||
| Furman | Furman | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Furman | |
| Gardner Webb | LIU | LIU | ||
| George Mason | LIU | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | LIU | |
| George Washington | George Washington | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | George Washington | |
| Georgetown | Georgetown | Georgetown | ||
| Harvard | Harvard | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Harvard | |
| High Point | High Point | High Point | ||
| Hofstra | Hofstra | Hofstra | ||
| Holy Cross | Holy Cross | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Holy Cross | |
| Howard (DC) | LIU | LIU | ||
| Iona | LIU | LIU | ||
| Jacksonville | Jacksonville | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Jacksonville | |
| James Madison | James Madison | James Madison | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Kennesaw State | LIU | LIU | ||
| Kent State | LIU | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | LIU | |
| La Salle | LIU | LIU 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Lafayette | Lafayette | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) | Lafayette | |
| Le Moyne | LIU | LIU | ||
| Lehigh | Lehigh | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Lehigh | |
| Liberty | Liberty | Liberty | ||
| Lindenwood | Lindenwood | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Lindenwood | |
| Longwood | LIU | LIU | ||
| Louisville | Louisville | Louisville | ||
| Loyola (MD) | Loyola (MD) | Loyola (MD) | ||
| Manhattan | LIU | LIU | ||
| Marist | LIU | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | LIU | |
| Marquette | Marquette | Marquette | ||
| Maryland | Maryland | Maryland | ||
| Massachusetts | Massachusetts | Massachusetts | ||
| Massachusetts-Lowell | Massachusetts-Lowell | Massachusetts-Lowell | ||
| Mercer | Mercer | Mercer | ||
| Mercyhurst | LIU | LIU | ||
| Merrimack | LIU | LIU 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Michigan | Michigan | Michigan | ||
| Monmouth (NJ) | Monmouth (NJ) | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Monmouth (NJ) | |
| Mount St Marys | Mount St Marys | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Mount St Marys | |
| Navy | Navy | Navy | ||
| New Hampshire | LIU | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | LIU | |
| Niagara | Niagara | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Niagara | |
| North Carolina | North Carolina | North Carolina | ||
| Northwestern | Northwestern | Northwestern | ||
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame | Notre Dame | ||
| Ohio State | Ohio State | Ohio State | ||
| Old Dominion | Old Dominion | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Old Dominion | |
| Oregon | Oregon | Oregon | ||
| Penn | Penn | Penn | ||
| Penn State | Penn State | Penn State | ||
| Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | ||
| Presbyterian | LIU | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | LIU | |
| Princeton | Princeton | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Princeton | |
| Queens | Queens | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Queens | |
| Quinnipiac | Quinnipiac | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 3) | Quinnipiac | |
| Radford | LIU | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | LIU | |
| Rhode Island | Rhode Island | tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) | Rhode Island | |
| Richmond | Richmond | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Richmond | |
| Rider | Rider | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Rider | |
| Robert Morris | Robert Morris | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Robert Morris | |
| Rutgers | Rutgers | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Rutgers | |
| Sacred Heart | LIU | LIU 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| San Diego State | San Diego State | San Diego State | ||
| Siena | Siena | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 1) | Siena | |
| South Florida | South Florida | South Florida | ||
| Southern California | Southern California | Southern California | ||
| St Bonaventure | St Bonaventure | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Bonaventure | |
| St Francis | LIU | LIU | ||
| St Josephs (PA) | St Josephs (PA) | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Josephs (PA) | |
| Stanford | Stanford | Stanford | ||
| Stetson | LIU | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | LIU | |
| Stonehill | LIU | LIU | ||
| Stony Brook | Stony Brook | Stony Brook 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Syracuse | Syracuse | Syracuse | ||
| Temple | Temple | Temple | ||
| Towson | Towson | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Towson | |
| UC Davis | UC Davis | UC Davis | ||
| UMBC | UMBC | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 2) | UMBC | |
| UNC-Charlotte | UNC-Charlotte | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | UNC-Charlotte | |
| Vanderbilt | Vanderbilt | Vanderbilt | ||
| VCU | VCU | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | VCU | |
| Vermont | Vermont | Vermont | ||
| Villanova | Villanova | Villanova | ||
| Virginia | Virginia | Virginia | ||
| Virginia Tech | Virginia Tech | Virginia Tech | ||
| Wagner | LIU | insuffient: ( 8- 1)( 7- 2) | LIU | |
| William & Mary | William & Mary | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | William & Mary | |
| Winthrop | LIU | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | LIU | |
| Wofford | LIU | LIU | ||
| Xavier | LIU | LIU | ||
| Yale | Yale | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Yale | |
| Youngstown State | LIU | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | LIU |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Hofstra ( 9- 7, 86.5) 6-11 -13.39 17.16 0.46 0.93 -12.09
0 A Massachusetts- (11- 6, 85.4) 6-15 -14.53 16.03 0.46 0.93 -13.15
0 H Bryant (11- 7, 85.8) 7-11 -14.07 16.49 -0.46 0.93 -13.58
0 A Massachusetts (15- 3, 91.0) 5-19 -8.89 21.67 0.46 0.93 -7.88
0 H Manhattan ( 3-13, 80.0) 10- 9 -19.90 10.65 -0.46 0.93 9.52
0 H Iona ( 9- 9, 82.5) 7- 5 -17.42 13.14 -0.46 0.93 11.85
0 H Vermont ( 6- 9, 83.7) 6-11 -16.16 14.40 -0.46 0.93 -15.53
0 A Fairleigh Dick ( 5-11, 76.5) 10- 7 -23.42 7.13 0.46 0.93 7.10
0 H Delaware State ( 0-14, 69.3) 19- 1 -30.56 1.00 -0.46 0.93 0.50
0 A Wagner ( 8- 7, 79.3) 11-12 -20.64 9.92 0.46 0.93 -18.86
0 A Le Moyne ( 4-13, 76.9) 9- 5 -23.00 7.55 0.46 0.93 7.49
0 A Mercyhurst ( 6- 9, 76.5) 19- 9 -23.42 7.14 0.46 0.93 7.10
0 H Central Connec ( 2-13, 73.5) 16- 2 -26.45 4.11 -0.46 0.93 3.41
0 H Stonehill (11- 7, 79.8) 11- 9 -20.10 10.46 -0.46 0.93 9.34
0 H St Francis ( 7-10, 78.2) 11-10 -21.69 8.87 -0.46 0.93 7.86
0 A Howard (DC) ( 1-14, 70.5) 13- 4 -29.41 1.15 0.46 0.93 1.51
0 N Wagner ( 8- 7, 79.3) 13- 7 -20.64 9.92 -0.00 0.93 9.27
0 A Stonehill (11- 7, 79.8) 14- 9 -20.10 10.46 0.46 0.93 10.21
------
4.07
|
